So, I read “Love Wins” by Rob Bell tonight (yes, the whole book, cover to cover – I speed read). Here’s what I posted to facebook real quick when I got home – I may have more thoughts about it after I’ve slept on it.
Speed-reading does have its advantages but disadvantages too… it’s not a book meant to be digested in two hours; rather it’s meant to be eaten in small bites, carefully considered, questioned, poked at, digested. But I was able to form a fairly considered opinion.
“Much ado about… well… a little.” I can’t say much ado about nothing, because some of Bell’s proposals are well beyond the pale of orthodoxy. I think I can agree with the core of what he’s saying – which amounts to, “For God SO loved the world…” but I’m not so sure I can agree with his conclusions.
Bell has a lot to say about heaven that I agree with – mainly that it’s not a “place we go off to when we die”, nor is it the time and place in which we *start* relating to God intimately. We play a tremendous role in bringing the future into now.
He has a lot to say about hell that I’d been considering lately – mainly that perhaps hell is less a “place other people go off to when they die” and more something that we create and sustain, ourselves… starting now and going forth into eternity.
He made some REALLY interesting points about what eternity is and how the word is used in the Greek, which I’ll be looking into more.
What needs careful evaluation and consideration is Bell’s proposal that this life may not be “it” and that hell is perhaps not eternal punishment, but is in and of itself designed to bring people to redemption… that even after this death… 100… 1000… 100000 years later the most hardened heart might grow weary of the hell they created for themselves, and choose Christ instead.
That certainly flies in the face of … well, of everything. Bell brings out quite a few Scriptures to support his position, which is interesting because several critics said in their reviews, “he doesn’t base the book on Scripture and doesn’t even refer to the Bible.” I certainly didn’t find that to be the case. That said, without serious time to study out what he’s saying, look up cross-references, and really dig into it, I’m not prepared to agree with his position. Nor am I prepared to wholly reject it.
At this point I’m just saying, “Hmmm. That’s interesting.”
Commentation